Resistance to Social InfluenceFlashcards - AQA Psychology

New Day

Current Quiz

You previously generated a quiz from this deck.

Spaced Repetition

This mode helps you retain information by reviewing flashcards at optimal intervals, focusing on what needs the most reinforcement each day.

New Flashcards Per Day

🗂️
Flashcards

The standard way to view your flashcards without any extras

🧠
Exam Mode

Practice active recall and assess your answers with AI

⏳
Spaced Repetition

Memorize your flashcards using a scientifically proven method

🎯
Generate Quiz

Use AI to generate a quiz based on the same content

Describe the role of social support in resistance to social influence.

Social support can help individuals resist pressures to conform or obey. If they have support from a dissenter (someone who disagrees with the majority or refuses to obey), it frees the individual from the pressure to conform or obey, allowing them to act independently. This was demonstrated in the Asch study investigating the unanimity of the majority, and in Milgram’s variation where a disobedient confederate refused to obey at a certain point.

1 / 24

Combine

All flashcards from the current deck will be added to the deck selected from this list.

Export

This text is tab separated and can be imported into various flashcard apps.

"Describe the role of social support in resistance to social influence."	"Social support can help individuals resist pressures to conform or obey. If they have support from a dissenter (someone who disagrees with the majority or refuses to obey), it frees the individual from the pressure to conform or obey, allowing them to act independently. This was demonstrated in the Asch study investigating the unanimity of the majority, and in Milgram’s variation where a disobedient confederate refused to obey at a certain point."
"Define the concept of 'Locus of Control' as proposed by Rotter."	"'Locus of Control' is a concept that describes how much a person believes they control what happens in their lives. It can be measured on a scale from high internal to high external. 'Internals' believe they have a great deal of control over their lives and attribute their successes and failures to themselves personally. 'Externals' feel that many things which happen are outside of their control, and attribute successes and failures to luck, fate, or other outside circumstances."
"How does the 'Locus of Control' influence resistance to social influence?"	"'Internals', who believe they have a great deal of control over their lives, are more likely to resist influence and demonstrate independent behaviour, as they are less likely to follow the crowd or blindly follow an order they think is wrong. 'Externals', who feel that many things which happen are outside of their control, are less likely to resist influence, as they are less likely to take personal responsibility for their behaviour and have more need for social approval."
"What did Allen and Levine (1971) find about the role of dissenters in conformity?"	"Allen and Levine (1971) found that introducing a dissenter in an Asch-style study greatly reduced conformity levels, even if the dissenter wore thick glasses and claimed they had poor eyesight. This supports the idea that having social support increases resistance to social influence."
"What did Holland (1967) find about the relationship between 'Locus of Control' and obedience?"	"Holland (1967) found that 37% of 'internals' refused to obey to the maximum shock level in a Milgram-type study, compared to 23% of 'externals'. This shows a link between locus of control and resistance to obedience."
"Define the concept of 'Minority Influence'."	"Minority influence is when a small group (or individual) influences the behaviour and beliefs of a larger group of people. This usually has a smaller effect than conformity to a majority, but an effect is possible."
"What are the three key factors that make a minority influence successful?"	"The three key factors are: Consistency (repeating the same message), Commitment (being prepared to make sacrifices or undertake ‘extreme’ activities), and Flexibility (being reasonable and non-dogmatic)."
"Explain the 'snowball effect' in the context of minority influence."	"The 'snowball effect' refers to the process where more and more people have their minds changed by the minority group, and they in turn persuade more of their friends and family to do the same. This results in the minority view becoming the majority view."
"Describe the findings of Moscovici's 1969 study on minority influence."	"Moscovici found that when the minority consistently gave a certain answer, the majority agreed with them 8.42% of the time. However, when the minority inconsistently gave the wrong answer, the majority agreed with them only 1.25% of the time. This supports that consistency is an important factor in minority influence."
"How does the concept of 'locus of control' relate to resistance to social influence?"	"Twenge et al (2004) found that over time, Americans have become more resistant to obedience, but have also become more external in their locus of control. This weakens the suggestion that having an internal locus of control leads to resistance to social influence."
"Describe the role of minority influence in social change."	"Minority influence plays a crucial role in social change. If a minority is consistent, committed, and flexible, it can draw attention to an issue, cause deeper processing of their arguments amongst the majority, and persuade people to change their views. This process is accelerated by the snowball effect."
"Define 'social cryptoamnesia'."	"'Social cryptoamnesia' is the concept that the population does not remember how or why a change has happened because it has become accepted as 'the norm'."
"How does conformity research contribute to social change?"	"Conformity research shows the importance of a dissenter, who encourages other people to not conform and therefore lead to social change. The role of normative influence can also be used to affect social change, for example by suggesting that others are behaving in a certain way."
"Explain the impact of obedience research on social change."	"Obedience research shows the power of a disobedient individual in effecting social change. A real-life example would be Rosa Parks, who was used as a disobedient role model. She encouraged many other people to refuse to give up their seat in white-only areas of buses during the era of segregation in the USA, eventually leading to the civil rights movement."
"Do the research tasks in the area of minority influence lack external validity?"	"Yes, much of the research in this area involves unrealistic tasks in artificial scenarios, therefore they do not tell us about real-life minority influence and lack external validity."
"How does minority influence cause deeper processing in private?"	"In a variation of Moscovici's experiment where participants could write their answers down, there was more agreement with the minority. This supports the idea that minority influence causes deeper processing in private, before people openly change their mind."
"Describe the findings of Nolan et al (2008) regarding energy use and social influence."	"Nolan et al (2008) found that messages encouraging less energy use were more effective when they suggested that other people were doing the same thing, indicating the role of normative influence in effecting social change."
"Define the role of consistency of a minority and the importance of dissenters in changing people's behaviour."	"Research such as Moscovici, Asch and Milgram’s variations support the potential role of consistency of a minority and the importance of dissenters in changing people’s behaviour."
"How does the frequency of social change reflect on the explanations of social change?"	"The fact that social change rarely happens, and if it does, it happens very slowly (often over decades) suggests that the explanations of social change are limited."
"Do obedience or conformity involve performing an action because of instruction?"	"Obedience involves performing an action because of instruction."
"Which explanation of conformity usually results in internalisation?"	"Informational social influence usually results in internalisation."
"Who developed the concept of the authoritarian personality?"	"Adorno developed the concept of the authoritarian personality."
"Are people with an external locus of control more or less likely to conform?"	"People with an external locus of control are more likely to conform."
"Where did Zimbardo’s prison study take place?"	"Zimbardo’s prison study took place at Stanford."

Click to copy

Image

Front

Describe the role of social support in resistance to social influence.

Back

Image

Print Flashcards

[{"id":1332631,"front":"Describe the role of social support in resistance to social influence.","back":"Social support can help individuals resist pressures to conform or obey. If they have support from a dissenter (someone who disagrees with the majority or refuses to obey), it frees the individual from the pressure to conform or obey, allowing them to act independently. This was demonstrated in the Asch study investigating the unanimity of the majority, and in Milgram’s variation where a disobedient confederate refused to obey at a certain point.","front_language":"English","back_language":"English","front_image":"","back_image":"","order":0,"explanation":"Social support plays a crucial role in helping individuals resist social influence. When individuals have support from a dissenter, it releases them from the pressure to conform or obey, enabling independent action. This was evident in Asch's and Milgram's studies, highlighting the impact of social support on resistance.","deleted_at":null,"flashcard_deck_id":"QgPTT","original_id":null,"examMode":{"text":"","correct":"","incorrect":"","info":""}},{"id":1332632,"front":"Define the concept of 'Locus of Control' as proposed by Rotter.","back":"'Locus of Control' is a concept that describes how much a person believes they control what happens in their lives. It can be measured on a scale from high internal to high external. 'Internals' believe they have a great deal of control over their lives and attribute their successes and failures to themselves personally. 'Externals' feel that many things which happen are outside of their control, and attribute successes and failures to luck, fate, or other outside circumstances.","front_language":"English","back_language":"English","front_image":"","back_image":"","order":0,"explanation":"Locus of Control, as proposed by Rotter, refers to the extent to which individuals believe they have control over events in their lives. This concept categorizes people as either \"internals,\" who believe they have control, or \"externals,\" who attribute events to external factors. It has implications for motivation, behavior, and mental health.","deleted_at":null,"flashcard_deck_id":"QgPTT","original_id":null,"examMode":{"text":"","correct":"","incorrect":"","info":""}},{"id":1332633,"front":"How does the 'Locus of Control' influence resistance to social influence?","back":"'Internals', who believe they have a great deal of control over their lives, are more likely to resist influence and demonstrate independent behaviour, as they are less likely to follow the crowd or blindly follow an order they think is wrong. 'Externals', who feel that many things which happen are outside of their control, are less likely to resist influence, as they are less likely to take personal responsibility for their behaviour and have more need for social approval.","front_language":"English","back_language":"English","front_image":"","back_image":"","order":0,"explanation":"The \"Locus of Control\" refers to individuals' beliefs about the extent to which they can control events in their lives. This belief influences how people respond to social influence. Internals are more likely to resist influence and demonstrate independent behavior, while externals are less likely to resist influence due to their lower sense of personal control. This is because internals take more personal responsibility for their actions and are less swayed by social approval.","deleted_at":null,"flashcard_deck_id":"QgPTT","original_id":null,"examMode":{"text":"","correct":"","incorrect":"","info":""}},{"id":1332634,"front":"What did Allen and Levine (1971) find about the role of dissenters in conformity?","back":"Allen and Levine (1971) found that introducing a dissenter in an Asch-style study greatly reduced conformity levels, even if the dissenter wore thick glasses and claimed they had poor eyesight. This supports the idea that having social support increases resistance to social influence.","front_language":"English","back_language":"English","front_image":"","back_image":"","order":0,"explanation":"Allen and Levine (1971) found that the presence of a dissenter in an Asch-style study significantly decreased conformity levels, even when the dissenter's credibility was questionable. This highlights the impact of social support in bolstering resistance to social influence.","deleted_at":null,"flashcard_deck_id":"QgPTT","original_id":null,"examMode":{"text":"","correct":"","incorrect":"","info":""}},{"id":1332635,"front":"What did Holland (1967) find about the relationship between 'Locus of Control' and obedience?","back":"Holland (1967) found that 37% of 'internals' refused to obey to the maximum shock level in a Milgram-type study, compared to 23% of 'externals'. This shows a link between locus of control and resistance to obedience.","front_language":"English","back_language":"English","front_image":"","back_image":"","order":0,"explanation":"Holland's (1967) findings suggest that individuals with an internal locus of control were more likely to resist obedience in a Milgram-type study compared to those with an external locus of control. This indicates a connection between one's belief in personal control and their willingness to comply with authority.","deleted_at":null,"flashcard_deck_id":"QgPTT","original_id":null,"examMode":{"text":"","correct":"","incorrect":"","info":""}},{"id":1332636,"front":"Define the concept of 'Minority Influence'.","back":"Minority influence is when a small group (or individual) influences the behaviour and beliefs of a larger group of people. This usually has a smaller effect than conformity to a majority, but an effect is possible.","front_language":"English","back_language":"English","front_image":"","back_image":"","order":0,"explanation":"Minority influence occurs when a small group or individual impacts the attitudes and behaviors of a larger group. This phenomenon is significant in understanding social dynamics and the potential for change within a community. It highlights the power of persistence and consistency in conveying alternative perspectives.","deleted_at":null,"flashcard_deck_id":"QgPTT","original_id":null,"examMode":{"text":"","correct":"","incorrect":"","info":""}},{"id":1332637,"front":"What are the three key factors that make a minority influence successful?","back":"The three key factors are: Consistency (repeating the same message), Commitment (being prepared to make sacrifices or undertake ‘extreme’ activities), and Flexibility (being reasonable and non-dogmatic).","front_language":"English","back_language":"English","front_image":"","back_image":"","order":0,"explanation":"Successful minority influence relies on consistency to reinforce the message, commitment to demonstrate dedication and willingness to make sacrifices, and flexibility to engage in open-minded and reasonable discussions. These factors help sway the majority towards the minority's viewpoint.","deleted_at":null,"flashcard_deck_id":"QgPTT","original_id":null,"examMode":{"text":"","correct":"","incorrect":"","info":""}},{"id":1332638,"front":"Explain the 'snowball effect' in the context of minority influence.","back":"The 'snowball effect' refers to the process where more and more people have their minds changed by the minority group, and they in turn persuade more of their friends and family to do the same. This results in the minority view becoming the majority view.","front_language":"English","back_language":"English","front_image":"","back_image":"","order":0,"explanation":"The \"snowball effect\" in minority influence occurs when a minority group gradually persuades more individuals to adopt their viewpoint, leading to a cascading effect as these individuals influence others. Eventually, the minority view becomes the majority perspective. This process demonstrates the power of consistent and persuasive minority influence in shaping broader societal attitudes and beliefs.","deleted_at":null,"flashcard_deck_id":"QgPTT","original_id":null,"examMode":{"text":"","correct":"","incorrect":"","info":""}},{"id":1332639,"front":"Describe the findings of Moscovici's 1969 study on minority influence.","back":"Moscovici found that when the minority consistently gave a certain answer, the majority agreed with them 8.42% of the time. However, when the minority inconsistently gave the wrong answer, the majority agreed with them only 1.25% of the time. This supports that consistency is an important factor in minority influence.","front_language":"English","back_language":"English","front_image":"","back_image":"","order":0,"explanation":"Moscovici's 1969 study on minority influence revealed that consistency significantly impacts the ability of a minority to influence the majority. Consistent minority opinions led to a higher rate of majority agreement compared to inconsistent opinions, highlighting the importance of consistency in minority influence.","deleted_at":null,"flashcard_deck_id":"QgPTT","original_id":null,"examMode":{"text":"","correct":"","incorrect":"","info":""}},{"id":1332640,"front":"How does the concept of 'locus of control' relate to resistance to social influence?","back":"Twenge et al (2004) found that over time, Americans have become more resistant to obedience, but have also become more external in their locus of control. This weakens the suggestion that having an internal locus of control leads to resistance to social influence.","front_language":"English","back_language":"English","front_image":"","back_image":"","order":0,"explanation":"The concept of \"locus of control\" refers to the extent to which individuals believe they have control over their lives. Research by Twenge et al. (2004) suggests that while Americans have become more resistant to obedience, they have also become more externally oriented in their locus of control. This challenges the idea that having an internal locus of control leads to resistance to social influence.","deleted_at":null,"flashcard_deck_id":"QgPTT","original_id":null,"examMode":{"text":"","correct":"","incorrect":"","info":""}},{"id":1332641,"front":"Describe the role of minority influence in social change.","back":"Minority influence plays a crucial role in social change. If a minority is consistent, committed, and flexible, it can draw attention to an issue, cause deeper processing of their arguments amongst the majority, and persuade people to change their views. This process is accelerated by the snowball effect.","front_language":"English","back_language":"English","front_image":"","back_image":"","order":0,"explanation":"Minority influence is essential in social change as it challenges the status quo, encourages critical thinking, and promotes new perspectives. When a committed minority presents consistent and persuasive arguments, it can sway the majority and initiate a snowball effect, leading to widespread change.","deleted_at":null,"flashcard_deck_id":"QgPTT","original_id":null,"examMode":{"text":"","correct":"","incorrect":"","info":""}},{"id":1332642,"front":"Define 'social cryptoamnesia'.","back":"'Social cryptoamnesia' is the concept that the population does not remember how or why a change has happened because it has become accepted as 'the norm'.","front_language":"English","back_language":"English","front_image":"","back_image":"","order":0,"explanation":"Social cryptoamnesia occurs when a society collectively forgets the origins of a cultural shift, accepting it as the norm without recalling its original catalyst. This phenomenon can lead to a lack of understanding about the reasons behind certain societal changes.","deleted_at":null,"flashcard_deck_id":"QgPTT","original_id":null,"examMode":{"text":"","correct":"","incorrect":"","info":""}},{"id":1332643,"front":"How does conformity research contribute to social change?","back":"Conformity research shows the importance of a dissenter, who encourages other people to not conform and therefore lead to social change. The role of normative influence can also be used to affect social change, for example by suggesting that others are behaving in a certain way.","front_language":"English","back_language":"English","front_image":"","back_image":"","order":0,"explanation":"Conformity research contributes to social change by highlighting the power of dissenters who challenge societal norms and encourage others to think independently. It also emphasizes the role of normative influence, where individuals can influence others to adopt new behaviors or challenge existing ones. This research underscores the potential for individuals to drive social change by questioning and challenging conformity.","deleted_at":null,"flashcard_deck_id":"QgPTT","original_id":null,"examMode":{"text":"","correct":"","incorrect":"","info":""}},{"id":1332647,"front":"Explain the impact of obedience research on social change.","back":"Obedience research shows the power of a disobedient individual in effecting social change. A real-life example would be Rosa Parks, who was used as a disobedient role model. She encouraged many other people to refuse to give up their seat in white-only areas of buses during the era of segregation in the USA, eventually leading to the civil rights movement.","front_language":"English","back_language":"English","front_image":"","back_image":"","order":0,"explanation":"Obedience research has demonstrated the potential for individuals to challenge authority and inspire social change. This was evident in the case of Rosa Parks, whose act of disobedience sparked a larger movement. It highlights the influence of non-conformity in driving societal transformation.","deleted_at":null,"flashcard_deck_id":"QgPTT","original_id":null,"examMode":{"text":"","correct":"","incorrect":"","info":""}},{"id":1332655,"front":"Do the research tasks in the area of minority influence lack external validity?","back":"Yes, much of the research in this area involves unrealistic tasks in artificial scenarios, therefore they do not tell us about real-life minority influence and lack external validity.","front_language":"English","back_language":"English","front_image":"","back_image":"","order":0,"explanation":"Research tasks in the area of minority influence often involve artificial scenarios, which limits their ability to reflect real-life situations. This lack of external validity hinders the generalizability of findings to real-world minority influence dynamics.","deleted_at":null,"flashcard_deck_id":"QgPTT","original_id":null,"examMode":{"text":"","correct":"","incorrect":"","info":""}},{"id":1332661,"front":"How does minority influence cause deeper processing in private?","back":"In a variation of Moscovici's experiment where participants could write their answers down, there was more agreement with the minority. This supports the idea that minority influence causes deeper processing in private, before people openly change their mind.","front_language":"English","back_language":"English","front_image":"","back_image":"","order":0,"explanation":"Minority influence causes deeper processing in private because when individuals are exposed to a minority viewpoint, they are more likely to engage in critical thinking and re-evaluate their own beliefs. This is supported by the finding that when participants could privately write down their answers, there was more agreement with the minority, indicating a shift in private attitudes. This suggests that minority influence prompts individuals to internally process and consider alternative perspectives before openly changing their minds.","deleted_at":null,"flashcard_deck_id":"QgPTT","original_id":null,"examMode":{"text":"","correct":"","incorrect":"","info":""}},{"id":1332667,"front":"Describe the findings of Nolan et al (2008) regarding energy use and social influence.","back":"Nolan et al (2008) found that messages encouraging less energy use were more effective when they suggested that other people were doing the same thing, indicating the role of normative influence in effecting social change.","front_language":"English","back_language":"English","front_image":"","back_image":"","order":0,"explanation":"Nolan et al (2008) discovered that messages promoting reduced energy use were more impactful when they conveyed that others were also engaging in the behavior. This highlights the significance of normative influence in driving societal shifts.","deleted_at":null,"flashcard_deck_id":"QgPTT","original_id":null,"examMode":{"text":"","correct":"","incorrect":"","info":""}},{"id":1332668,"front":"Define the role of consistency of a minority and the importance of dissenters in changing people's behaviour.","back":"Research such as Moscovici, Asch and Milgram’s variations support the potential role of consistency of a minority and the importance of dissenters in changing people’s behaviour.","front_language":"English","back_language":"English","front_image":"","back_image":"","order":0,"explanation":"Research by psychologists such as Moscovici, Asch, and Milgram has demonstrated the significant impact of consistency in minority opinions and the presence of dissenters in influencing people's behavior. These studies provide empirical evidence for the role of these factors in shaping social dynamics and driving behavioral change.","deleted_at":null,"flashcard_deck_id":"QgPTT","original_id":null,"examMode":{"text":"","correct":"","incorrect":"","info":""}},{"id":1332669,"front":"How does the frequency of social change reflect on the explanations of social change?","back":"The fact that social change rarely happens, and if it does, it happens very slowly (often over decades) suggests that the explanations of social change are limited.","front_language":"English","back_language":"English","front_image":"","back_image":"","order":0,"explanation":"The infrequency and slow pace of social change imply that the explanations of social change are not comprehensive enough. If social change occurred more frequently and rapidly, it would indicate that our understanding of the causes and mechanisms of social change is more complete. The limited occurrence of social change suggests that there are complex and multifaceted factors at play that are not fully understood or accounted for in current explanations.","deleted_at":null,"flashcard_deck_id":"QgPTT","original_id":null,"examMode":{"text":"","correct":"","incorrect":"","info":""}},{"id":1332670,"front":"Do obedience or conformity involve performing an action because of instruction?","back":"Obedience involves performing an action because of instruction.","front_language":"English","back_language":"English","front_image":"","back_image":"","order":0,"explanation":"Obedience typically involves following instructions or commands from an authority figure, such as a parent, teacher, or boss. Conformity, on the other hand, involves adjusting one's behavior to match that of a group or societal norm, rather than specific instructions.","deleted_at":null,"flashcard_deck_id":"QgPTT","original_id":null,"examMode":{"text":"","correct":"","incorrect":"","info":""}},{"id":1332671,"front":"Which explanation of conformity usually results in internalisation?","back":"Informational social influence usually results in internalisation.","front_language":"English","back_language":"English","front_image":"","back_image":"","order":0,"explanation":"Informational social influence is a type of conformity where individuals conform to a group's beliefs or behaviors because they believe the group has accurate information. This can lead to internalization, which is the process of accepting the group's beliefs or behaviors as one's own. Internalization occurs when individuals genuinely change their attitudes or beliefs to align with the group, rather than just publicly conforming to avoid social disapproval.","deleted_at":null,"flashcard_deck_id":"QgPTT","original_id":null,"examMode":{"text":"","correct":"","incorrect":"","info":""}},{"id":1332672,"front":"Who developed the concept of the authoritarian personality?","back":"Adorno developed the concept of the authoritarian personality.","front_language":"English","back_language":"English","front_image":"","back_image":"","order":0,"explanation":"Adorno, a German philosopher and sociologist, is credited with developing the concept of the authoritarian personality. He conducted extensive research on the psychological traits and attitudes that contribute to authoritarianism. Adorno's work focused on understanding the origins and characteristics of individuals who are prone to authoritarianism, shedding light on the social and psychological factors that shape their behavior and beliefs. His research has had a significant impact on the field of psychology and our understanding of authoritarianism.","deleted_at":null,"flashcard_deck_id":"QgPTT","original_id":null,"examMode":{"text":"","correct":"","incorrect":"","info":""}},{"id":1332673,"front":"Are people with an external locus of control more or less likely to conform?","back":"People with an external locus of control are more likely to conform.","front_language":"English","back_language":"English","front_image":"","back_image":"","order":0,"explanation":"Individuals with an external locus of control tend to believe that external factors control their lives, leading them to conform more to societal norms or expectations. This conformity may stem from their belief that outcomes are beyond their control, influencing their behavior to align with others.","deleted_at":null,"flashcard_deck_id":"QgPTT","original_id":null,"examMode":{"text":"","correct":"","incorrect":"","info":""}},{"id":1332674,"front":"Where did Zimbardo’s prison study take place?","back":"Zimbardo’s prison study took place at Stanford.","front_language":"English","back_language":"English","front_image":"","back_image":"","order":0,"explanation":"Zimbardo's prison study took place at Stanford University. This study was conducted in the basement of the psychology department building, which was transformed into a simulated prison environment. The purpose of the study was to investigate the psychological effects of perceived power and authority on both prisoners and guards. The study gained significant attention and raised ethical concerns due to the extreme psychological distress experienced by the participants.","deleted_at":null,"flashcard_deck_id":"QgPTT","original_id":null,"examMode":{"text":"","correct":"","incorrect":"","info":""}}]

Options

Arrange Cards

Chronological

Random

Card Direction

Front First

Back First

Share this deck

Click to copy

Delete this deck

Are you sure you want to delete this deck? This cannot be undone.

Resistance to Social Influence Flashcards

New Day

Current Quiz

Spaced Repetition

New Flashcards Per Day

🗂️
Flashcards

🧠
Exam Mode

⏳
Spaced Repetition

🎯
Generate Quiz

Describe the role of social support in resistance to social influence.

Combine

Export

Front

Back

Print Flashcards

Print Type

Font Size

Rows Per Page

Options

Arrange Cards

Card Direction

Share this deck

Delete this deck

Resistance to Social Influence Flashcards

New Day

Current Quiz

Spaced Repetition

New Flashcards Per Day

🗂️ Flashcards

🧠 Exam Mode

⏳ Spaced Repetition

🎯 Generate Quiz

Describe the role of social support in resistance to social influence.

Combine

Export

Front

Back

Print Flashcards

Print Type

Font Size

Rows Per Page

Options

Arrange Cards

Card Direction

Share this deck

Delete this deck

🗂️
Flashcards

🧠
Exam Mode

⏳
Spaced Repetition

🎯
Generate Quiz